| Business | Rating | Reviews | Review strength* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kisling, Nestico & Redick (you) | 4.8 | 261 | 11.61 |
| O'Connor, Acciani & Levy | 4.7 | 1355 | 14.72 |
| Rittgers Rittgers & Nakajima | 5 | 439 | 13.22 |
| SPIVAK & SAKELLARIOU | 4.9 | 396 | 12.73 |
| Gile Injury Law | 4.9 | 258 | 11.83 |
| Buckeye Law Group | 4.9 | 233 | 11.61 |
| Morgan & Morgan | 4.7 | 140 | 10.1 |
Why it matters: The local pack shows 3 results; review strength is the main tiebreaker for who gets in.
The fix: Close the review gap (volume + velocity) and fully optimize the profile to outrank weaker pack members first.
Why it matters: Competitors out-proof you in the pack.
The fix: Add a post-service review ask to every job ticket.
Why it matters: Wasted keyword real estate; Google uses it for relevance matching.
The fix: Write a 750-char description front-loading services + city.
Every issue in this report is fixable within 30 days.